![𝔸𝕒𝕠𝕟 ℂ𝕣𝕖𝕒 [+..••]](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1031997703721443328/M190QMr8_normal.jpg)
The article to which you are referring doesn't even deal with GG. It just refuted a really bad survey with an expert. @RationalWiki
Hi @RationalWiki! You are wrong on nearly every point when you talk about me in the following "claim".pic.twitter.com/dwL1vlvLvz
-
-
-
The article did not misrepresent the survey at all. A survey expert said even as exploratory surveys go, it was useless.
@RationalWiki -
If you would like to contact the professor who teaches survey design, I'd be happy to get you in touch with her.
@RationalWiki -
Ghazi did not ban me because I falsely represented anything. They banned me because I refuted a survey they liked, full-stop.
@RationalWiki -
I look forward to seeing your obviously impending corrections, since you are such a reasonable place,
@RationalWiki!
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Everything on there is argued in bad faith. I wonder if they've added rebuttals to the CON leaks yet?
-
Is that idiot ryulong still writing for them? If so I'm sure he's on the case!
-
i think they banned even the great double dragon...
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Ryulong also edited Wikipedia according to ZQ's orders, see
#CONLeaks -
There was also some evidence that aGG paid Ryulong moving expenses
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Yes as I recall there was a discussion on Reddit in 2014
-
Tweet unavailable
-
So much shit has gone down that we've forgotten a lot of it
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.