That's great - but it'd also be great if you WEREN'T partnering with oil companies to more efficiently pull oil out of the ground. That oil needs to stay where it is, and only economics will keep it there. It's not enough to be good; stop helping bad guys do bad things.
-
-
-
We need fossil fuels to transition in to a carbon neutral state. Having an "Us vs. Them" mentality towards energy doesn't do anything to fix the problem, it simply creates a rift. Oil and gas is required for many more things than just energy generation.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Apparently $300 billion is enough to reverse climate change. Surely a company with a $1 trillion market cap can afford a lot more than $1 billion. We expect more from Microsoft this is a decent start
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
First dotnet core and now this, excellent work!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Really pleased that carbon negative has entered the thinking, rather than neutral
-
New conversation -
-
-
Better idea. We tax Microsoft as they should be and use that money as a society to fight climate change
-
Why not both?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thank you for setting the example of the impact companies can make with
#boldgoals dedicated to investing in#sustainability.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.