Necessity would be a legal obligation (and it's one of the most common avenues for attacking a Title III wiretap). But there's not really any evidence on that point - so yet another episode of blind men grasping at the elephant.
-
-
-
I can't quite figure out whether McCarthy's argument are purely partisan at this point, or whether there's some merit and I'm just blinded to that side due to my own partisan blinders. He's certainly more articulate than some, but as a non-lawyer I find the arguments strained.
- Još 5 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Since McCarthy is clearly the outlier on this issue, it would help if he and/or cohort Hugh Hewitt would cite cases or something non-anecdotal in support of their unequivocal conclusions of impropriety.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
They weren't just trying to verify that the meeting took place, so an interview would not provide the necessary intel. Also, do we know that the FBI got stored communications? It's not automatic. Still wondering about particularized min procedures. Haven't seen anything on that.
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
It amazes me why some people are worried about a teaboy all of a sudden and not the fact that he is probably a Russia spy
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.