publish leaked classified information. If DOJ can win this case against Assange, and they can get established precedent for the idea that the Government decides who is and is not a journalist for purposes of the Espionage Act, it will threaten the very foundation of the free
-
-
Afficher cette discussion
-
press. This is the case the Obama team wasn’t willing to make due to fears about constitutional ramifications. Trump’s team is apparently willing to make the argument. You have to wonder why, don’t you? So thanks a lot,
@realDonaldTrump, because now I have to defend AssangeAfficher cette discussion -
and say that these new charges are unconstitutional. And I really don’t look forward to making that statement. /end
Afficher cette discussion
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
strange times, indeed.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
But what about Assange’s ties to the Russian government? If this is what they can prove, doesn’t that change the precedent?
-
They’re not alleging that
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Attempting to fix foreign elections is not protected by freedom of press no more than shouting fire in a crowded room is protected by freedom of speech. It's worse than that.
-
Ce Tweet est indisponible.
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
I love it. He needs to go to jail and I don’t really care what charge they use. I want revenge on him for helping to elect Trump.
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.