Brazilian Reproducibility Initiative

@BrRepInitiative

The Brazilian Reproducibility Initiative is a multicenter effort to estimate the reproducibility of Brazilian biomedical science.

Vrijeme pridruživanja: lipanj 2018.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @BrRepInitiative

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @BrRepInitiative

  1. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. velj

    This action raises the obvious question: is it not our duty to do this for all research on disease?

    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    "Our project is illegal, but it’s the right thing to do in this crisis. We refuse to put copyright before human lives." People are using to freely but illicitly share more than 5,000 scientific articles on the

    Poništi
  3. 4. To be clear, leaving it to the internet shouting factory to separate the wheat from the chaff is still not good enough. We do need more formal methods of certification - but there is no way that the anonymous opinion of 2 or 3 people will provide a solid basis for this.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  4. Lessons from the /HIV story: 1. Yes, we urgently need better quality control of publications. 2. There’s little to no evidence that traditional peer review is effective at it. 3. If anything, online comments are currently quicker and better in debunking bad science.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    2. velj

    It's frustrating and sad that this project - the Coronavirus Papers - has to operate illegally:

    Poništi
  6. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    2. velj

    This may be the fastest ever retraction due to mass peer-review of a manuscript in the history of publishing. Never happens with the most forged articles in main-stream publishing. This is only a testimony to how vital posting pre-prints became!

    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. velj

    Types of peer review: 1) 3 anonymous scientists write secret reviews in a process that takes a few months 2) dozens of known experts write comments that anyone in the world can see hours after a paper is posted (e.g this thread 👇) Explain to me again why is 1 >> 2?

    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. velj

    And with a permanent climate crisis, antibiotic resistance, the need to feed the world, etc...remind me again why this is the exception rather than the rule...

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  9. Pretty statements about open access during outbreaks only make it more insulting that we don't have open access for everything else, as if the rest of science just wasn't important.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. "As with all work with immediate public health significance, articles about the coronavirus outbreak will be made freely available at from the day of publication." Well, isn't everything in the of public health significance?

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. “Scientific publishers as we know them today remain a threatened species. They will have to do more to prove their added value to science and society. Unless they do so, they may not deserve to survive” writes ⁦⁩ at ⁦⁩.

    Poništi
  12. When reading something like this, you first get excited and optimistic. But then you think “ok, but why the hell does it take a deadly epidemic for scientists to open up their data?” and you’re just angry as usual.

    Poništi
  13. “Preprinting therefore creates a marketplace that aligns the key goals and cultural incentives for open access and open science—rewarding authors and journals for the quality of their research and evaluation processes.” (by ⁦⁩)

    Poništi
  14. A great example that a scientific society can change a self-interested instance on open access due to pressure from its members. Are there any chemists out there doing the same for (probably the worst example of them all)?

    Poništi
  15. Just a couple of hours left to register for our prediction project at ! Or perhaps a few more, as we are going to sleep now and will wake up early tomorrow to send invites to all of you last-minute people...

    Poništi
  16. Today is the LAST day to register for our prediction project at The grim reaper won't catch you if you miss it, but you'll lose a great opportunity to test your reproducibility prediction skills AND do some subsidized online betting! :)

    Poništi
  17. The summary for the Preprints I/O meeting by and last December is out and it's a very worthwhile read for anyone interested in preprints! We were glad to be represented by at the meeting!

    Poništi
  18. Time is running out to join our prediction project! Register until tomorrow, Jan 24, at … to answer our survey and get credits to bet on our prediction markets! More on

    Poništi
  19. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    23. sij

    I love reading philosophy of science but the field might gain some popularity if instead of Einstein's theory of relativity, Copernicus and telescopes, and the DNA helix, they discussed topics a bit more representative of the run of the mill research 99.99% of us do.

    Poništi
  20. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    23. sij
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·