Tuits

Has blocat @BoutrousTed

Estàs segur que vols veure aquests tuits? Això no desblocarà @BoutrousTed.

  1. Tuit fixat
    20 d’abr.

    The introductions to the two volumes of the Mueller Report do not contain a single redaction and could have been released in full on March 24 instead of the Barr letter.

    Desfés
  2. fa 20 hores

    The case for obstruction of justice against made, on the streets of New York, by is powerful.

    Desfés
  3. ha retuitat
    26 d’abr.

    There are so many outrages, but at the level of whether our democracy survives intact, this is the most important story of today, tomorrow & the forseeable future.And I cannot understand the silence of most of my profession at this dangerous, frontal challenge to the rule of law.

    Mostra el fil
    Desfés
  4. 26 d’abr.

    It was a very bumpy landing—and I thought AG Barr said he was landing the plane?

    Desfés
  5. ha retuitat
    24 d’abr.
    Desfés
  6. 24 d’abr.

    But what the White House didn’t seem to realize is that you can’t “assert” Executive Privilege after you have “waived” it. Which is a pretty big mistake.

    Desfés
  7. ha retuitat
    24 d’abr.

    The we-don’t-want-to-play-anymore “privilege.” Sorry, that one’s not in the books.

    Desfés
  8. 23 d’abr.

    This obstructive effort is doomed to fail because the White House has waived Executive Privilege at least twice—first by letting McGahn testify to the Special Counsel and then by not objecting to the public release of his testimony during the redacting of Mueller’s report.

    Desfés
  9. ha retuitat
    23 d’abr.

    DC Circuit panel today questioned continued broad secrecy in mystery company's case—the government's effort to entirely shield secret-argument transcript 'appears to go too far' //// calls today's order a win for transparency

    Mostra el fil
    Desfés
  10. ha retuitat
    23 d’abr.

    DC Circuit is open to broader release of info than requested: "[W]e believe the benefits of public scrutiny extend to other filings as well—particularly, to the government’s attempt to bar the corporation’s attorneys from publicly identifying themselves."

    Mostra el fil
    Desfés
  11. ha retuitat
    23 d’abr.

    Mystery company case: DC Circuit says it is prepared to release more court documents in Mueller grand jury fight, but not the identity of the foreign state-owned corporation. Order:

    Mostra el fil
    Desfés
  12. 23 d’abr.

    Isn’t there a University of New Hampshire?

    Mostra el fil
    Desfés
  13. 23 d’abr.

    They are asking good questions, but the exclusive Harvard and Saint Anselm student questioning really is a dissonant note in these Democratic CNN town halls that are focusing in part on educational equality.

    Mostra el fil
    Desfés
  14. 22 d’abr.

    Another gap: Mueller Report Vol.I, in “assessing the evidence,” doesn’t apply the “common principles that apply in any investigation,” like inferring criminal intent from circumstantial evidence and factors “often relevant in assessing credibility” applied in Vol.II at 13-14.

    Mostra el fil
    Desfés
  15. 22 d’abr.

    Big gap in Mueller Report Vol. I: no analysis of significance of TOTALITY of evidence of (1) many Trump family/business/campaign Russia contacts;(2) intense Russian active measures; & (3) Trump’s strong encouragement of/denials of Russian election intrusions while embracing Putin

    Mostra el fil
    Desfés
  16. 21 d’abr.

    “when we are seeking to learn whether a presidential candidate worked with a hostile foreign power to win an election, the public deserves to have that candidate answer questions under oath.”

    Desfés
  17. ha retuitat
    20 d’abr.
    Desfés
  18. ha retuitat
    20 d’abr.

    Yes. Completely (further) exposes what Barr was trying to do - protect Trump. Which. Is. Not. His. Job.

    Desfés
  19. 20 d’abr.

    Understatement: “In previous administrations, when it was revealed that press secretaries had delivered false statements from the White House podium, there was more of a reaction and often some soul-searching.”

    Desfés
  20. 20 d’abr.

    It’s very important that spoke out and we need more public officials and public figures to do so. We are in a national emergency and need people from both parties to come together and save our democratic system.

    Desfés

Sembla que triga molt a carregar-se.

És possible que el Twitter hagi assolit el límit de capacitat o que experimenti una sobrecàrrega momentània. Torna-ho a provar o vés a l'estat del Twitter si en vols obtenir més informació.

    També et pot interessar

    ·