I wouldn’t say they clowned themselves. It wasn’t great as proposed. A lot of fixing was need had it passed. I voted yes but it not passing is a “meh.”
-
-
Replying to @BounceOffEd @ArmandDoma and
I voted no even though I vehemently oppose cash bail. I do statistical analysis for a living, so algorithms are my bread and butter. The problem is that what you get out of an algorithm depends on the data used to develop it. Data from a heavily racially biased 1/
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Mallrat9000 @AlisandeDM and
I am aware that probation employees input data the data and elected judges are terrified that f the .0001 possibility that the defendant will go out and commit a headline crime. Faith in them is misplaced
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Mallrat9000 @AlisandeDM and
SF does a pretty good job, not great, but OK. That's because of the people there. This is not that case in Riverside, orange, Yolo, Contra costa, Bakersfield, LA, SD etc. This was a choice between 2 bad options.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Mallrat9000 @AlisandeDM and
I was being polite. You can google it yourself. Probation officers that input the information that spits out the risk assessment number are cops. They will put the arrested in the least favorable light. Status quo allows people to be ripped off by bail agents and be free.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
I know that with that bill pretrial detention would increase. I don't like cash bail any more than you do, and I did in fact vote yes, but you seem to pretend that that P25 was only good. It wasn't. it was "meh." we can do better. It's not a hill to fight over.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.