It's a terrible argument no matter who says it, of course. I challenged Clinton's argument on 3 grounds — history, economics, and morality. How about responding on those grounds, instead of sniping at nonexistent sexism?
-
-
-
Citing the
@ACLU is a response on those grounds, but here's a 2018 study from The American Journal of Public Health (@AMJPublicHealth) in case it wasn't enough. I think prioritizing embryos over women is pretty immoral, but agree to disagree.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5803812/ …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I agree with Chelsea completely!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How about guys like you and the president stop knocking women up then we can discuss if you have the right to tell them what to do with their bodies.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What a disingenuous headline.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
one reason women give for having an abortion is that they can't afford another child. children are expensive so it makes them less poor
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's wretched but it's not wrong, and if that's what it takes to convince wretched people whom only care about money that Trump is wrong, than that's what it will take. That being said I despise the Clinton's, why does this woman believe she is qualified on this subject?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.