@BoingBoing @GingerReads That's fantastic. Nobody deserves to see their creative work fall into public domain. Strange some think otherwise
-
-
-
@blakejharrisNYC I believe in supporting artists & their creative works. I also believe in more access. I see both sides. -
@GingerReads But what do you mean "access?" For the price of a book, which is usually cheap for "classics" you can read it. -
@blakejharrisNYC classics are usually cheaper cause they are in the public domain. -
@GingerReads I mean classics like those often read in school. But regardless, do you think price is really the barrier here? -
@blakejharrisNYC well, I read almost 170 books last year. If they were cheap, like $9.99, it would be well over $1,600
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@BoingBoing didn't steal them from me, I didn't create any of 'em....Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@BoingBoing@RubenBolling SO when I read these stories, I never see the admittedly short list of what it didn'tThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@BoingBoing Uhg, this stinks. Our copyright laws are all fucked up. Thanks,@DisneyThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@BoingBoing We can read these works. We just have to pay the people who wrote them.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@BoingBoing Didn't steal it from me. Copyright is for other people.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.