@BoingBoing if you were using http://libnanews.com for your 160 source, they've backed down to 140..
-
-
-
@KHLazarus we were not. We added reports from various government officials together. Very likely will be revised.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.