@BoingBoing @doctorow @Joannechocolat So you would be happy for someone to violate a CC ND licence?
-
-
-
@phil_b@BoingBoing@Joannechocolat changing your own copy of a file doesn't violate a license. Only distribution -
@doctorow@BoingBoing@Joannechocolat But as far as I can tell they are selling the books, effectively as a derivative work? -
@phil_b@BoingBoing@Joannechocolat no. They sell a program that changes how the books you own are displayed. -
@doctorow@phil_b@BoingBoing Yes: and imposes a different interpretation onto your words. -
@Joannechocolat@phil_b@BoingBoing So what? That's what annotation has done forever. -
@doctorow@phil_b@BoingBoing It's not the same thing. The implication is that the author's intention doesn't matter. -
@Joannechocolat@phil_b@BoingBoing no. It's that authors can't coerce readers who choose to disregard their intentions - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.