@BoingBoing @doctorow Goddamn it. No. Hadfield et al signed a one-year contract. Bowie didn’t make a “claim.” I agree it makes little sense
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@BoingBoing@doctorow Are you sure@davidbowie is to blame? I thought he sold off the rights to his back catelogue years ago? -
@davidcushman@BoingBoing@doctorow Agreement was always that they'd licence it for 1 year, as far as I know. -
@richjm@BoingBoing@doctorow so no take down then? Oh dear. New media apes bad habits of the old. At least it can be swiftly corrected? -
@davidcushman@BoingBoing@doctorow Details on the whole thing here from the man himself http://www.reddit.com/r/videos/comments/25gbc3/bowies_last_day_we_had_permission_for_a_year_so/chgv40r … - End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@BoingBoing@doctorow I’m more interested in why Hadfield etc didn’t say a year ago they only had a year license and withheld that tidbit.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@BoingBoing@doctorow but don’t get the facts wrong. The Ottawa Citizen editorial is correct; your summary & tweet are not.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.