I resisted the urge because it's a semantics rabbit hole that shouldn't get in the way of our Cool overlord
-
-
-
Can I say hes the first character from a franchise that wasnt originally created in japan? Does that work? Lol
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I think your pick was the most realistic. That character combo was made purely by a British team. Everything else has major connections from a previous series or by being created in Japan.
-
just gotta be very careful with how i word it lol
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
most important thing in this thread is getting spot into the roster
-
revision: i want spot vs. the noid by next springpic.twitter.com/Xya8whL63O
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Bob "Video Game Genius" Wulff
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The correct representation of this would be that banjo is the first fighter from a non-Japanese franchise!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Banjo-Kazooie, Dark Samus, Diddy Kong, King K. Rool, Little Mac and Donkey Kong's modern design were all created by Western studios. But Banjo-Kazooie is the first and only (as of right now) Smash fighter to be owned by a non-Japanese video game publishing company, Microsoft.
-
So you're right in terms of copyrights ownership.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.