A1: It is important that women can report these events without going public. Perhaps a public policy exception to void NDAs when it is in the public interest to allow women who wish to go public with their stories. #EmpLawChat
-
-
-
Don't we have to litigate what is in the public interest then? Increasing legal costs? (I do need to keep paying my mortgage however...)
#EmpLawChat
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
A1: Too many companies use such agreements to intimidate and silence. There must be a compelling business reason, not just a motivation to prevent litigation.
#EmpLawChatThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A1: Arbitration agreements and NDAs can silence women. It is important for victimized woman to tell their stories if they want to. At the same time, important they can receive legal relief without making themselves the subject of public commentary.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Follow our journalists: