that facebook graph thopic.twitter.com/VTiR3lEmfi
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
You mean the article from Denmark? Islam controlled Denmark?


An ethics paper form http://Aeon.com ? HAHAHAHA!!!! "Look! I found a blog on the internet that disagrees with the CDC, the AAP, and the WHO! They must be right! as it gets into "ethics"!" Try again. Its a different procedure.
Type 1 FGM is the exact same as male #circumcision. Both remove the prepuce (clitoral hood/foreskin), and both remove the most erogenous skin (glans clitoris/frenulum & ridged bands).
Use biology and facts to prove me wrong. Stop using the naturalistic fallacy.
"Is the exact same" Wow is someone going to learn some cool things in grade 7 biology!
I can guarantee you never learned what the prepuce is.
Typo meant some men prefer women with no labias, also the justifications for circumcising either gender are the same
Who exactly prefers women with no Labia's? Show me the evidence.
Weren't you going to find me some men who prefer it? They also remove tonsils there. That doesn't mean: "Men prefer it"


BOTH are non therapeutical infant surgery so BOTH are 100% comparable because BOTH are GENITAL MUTILATION and BOTH sexes deserve the same level of protection from medical malpractice and bloody superstitions.
No, they're the exact same thing. Non-consensual cutting of a baby's genitals. If anything, male genital mutilation is much worse than female genital mutilation because foreskins have 20,000 nerve endings and serve several purposes and are a significant portion of the penis.
Also why can’t this procedure be done voluntarily?
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.