Used to love Novella's podcast. But the ego got to me, as did the absolute certainty of pronouncements, which even he should know is not science.
-
-
-
I still think it’s an excellent podcast. I’d love to talk to Novella on his own about this issue, without the influence of Gorski. Gorski is an absolute crusader on this, but Novella doesn’t strike me as a crusader for anything. Not normally anyway. I’m at a loss.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Oof, that's a whopper!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I hope they will correct this and apologize.
-
I wouldn’t hold my breath. It seems the only recourse for holding these people accountable is tort lawsuits.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I doubt any one of them has had the time (or interest) to research the issue fully, nor read Shrier's book. The review was published, the TRAs mobilized, & SBM found itself in a shit storm. They accepted 'experts' to speak for them, because they didn't know better. IMO.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Any link of the article
. Saludos from ChileThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Unfortunately when
@sciencebasedmed morphed into just being a vanity project for@gorskon, it ceased being worth following. -
Gorski devotes most of his day to labelling anyone he disagrees with as "anti-vax." GORSKI'S LAW: A Skeptic Ends Discussion by Calling You Anti-Vaxhttps://disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/gorskis-law-a-skeptic-ends-discussion …
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.