Only that it's not centrally run. But the outcome is the same. Censor anything that doesn't agree with the viewpoint of the party
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
- Show replies
-
-
-
If enough people grab their pitchforks and cry trans heresy then science and good faith discussion will be burned at the stake.
-
Actually, the paper truly was junk, as one can see if one actually reads it carefully, as I did:https://sillyolme.wordpress.com/2019/12/03/critique-of-gliskes-gender-dysphoria-conjucture/ …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
So mob rule dictates science now ?
-
Apparently so.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Actually, the paper tried to discredit the science that trans dogmatists don't like... but in doing so, ignored the evidence in a very sloppy manner:https://sillyolme.wordpress.com/2019/12/03/critique-of-gliskes-gender-dysphoria-conjucture/ …
End of conversation
-
-
-
But it only has 1 author. Makes sense as 900 is more than 1.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Please don't jump on the "it must have upset the trans" bandwagon... actually, the paper was just bad science and actually attempted to ignore most of the science that transfolk don't like...https://sillyolme.wordpress.com/2019/12/03/critique-of-gliskes-gender-dysphoria-conjucture/ …
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.