Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
@BjornLomborg you badly discredit yourself when you include renewables with a small % of TOTAL global energy. Green energy is IN electricity generation - whereas 55% of oil is consumed in transportation fuels. @MLiebreich
Global warming is driven by *all* energy emissions, not just subset of electricity Presenting % renewables of electricity leaves out 60% of emissions i.e. less informative to the efficacy of our solutions (And pls keep civil, no need for "discredit" – just make ur argument)
Fine, show renewables as a % of final energy. Your persistent use of primary energy is deliberately misleading - unless you simply haven't understood that wind, solar and hydro will never supply the 2/3 of primary energy that is thermal waste. They simply eliminate it at source.
Huh, in Germany we have a big contribution from pv and wind energy but we will not be able to suspend any gas or coal due to availability concernis and back up. That means that pv + wind do have even more waste energy in total due to back up concerns.
Emissions? Your aim was to slight what #Wind & #Solar have become. As well: View map, w focus on those that import "Energy" aka #OIL - China worlds largest energy market - Japan? I follow energy & I am an investor - I go where the puck will be = electricity China agrees w me!pic.twitter.com/6sHu6X5IOQ
Energy stats uncontroversial till incommensurate data used to track energy transition progress. Now a real need to reconcile. Could be done via agreed target for electrical energy needs of the goal, an all-electric world. Estimates exist (220 to 370 EJ), more work needed.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
