I'm more & more wondering what is the use of your "work". Je me demande de plus en plus quelle est l'utilité de votre "travail".
-
-
-
Simple. Mr Lomborg's work sheds light on the narrative that we are "almost there" on the conversion to unreliable wind and solar. This could t be further from the thruth. yet it is the mantra of money hungry gov'ts.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
This might be interesting for you. It shows how accurate past predictions by
@IEA actually werehttps://twitter.com/aukehoekstra/status/931869221386104832 …
-
Is this true? In this case
@BjornLomborg must be getting bad data? He cannot be this ignorant right? - Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
According to a 26 page report commissioned by the gwpf from a professor of economics at Glasgow university, wind only saves 2.8% of co2. How many hospitals could we have built with that wasted money.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
But where's the money going for new installations? Natural gas, wind, solar, in that order.pic.twitter.com/NVdfNLoGYq
-
Of course wind and solar have to have natural gas as backup so this makes sense.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Hydroelectricity is safe "renewable" but is pretty well "maxed out" already. Nukes seem to be the only low carbon alternative.
-
Unsubsidized cost of new solar projects with batteries at 0,07$/kWh and dropping.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
true Bjorn. we never can't afford it and it is strategically wrong also. "The biggest and largest producer of the solar- and wind power generators are planning to take over the world". It depends on how you want to read the statement...
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.