yes, it does With adaptation, extra costs to adapt and extra costs from flooding each contribute about 0.01% of GDP by 2100http://www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1222469111 …
-
-
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Right, as long as the world doesn't end...
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Not horrible on average, but aggregate number masks the greater impact on poor regions. Damage estimates by US county under RCP8.5 (90% confidence): Richest third: -1.2 — 6.8% Poorest third: 2.0 — 19.6% http://science.sciencemag.org/content/356/6345/1362 …pic.twitter.com/sMTGX5LnCy
-
RCP 8.5 is further afield from reality than a Hobbit movie. Have you looked?
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Your selfishness is, as ever, epic. You continually talk about "a problem for the future" that we need not worry so much about now. If we lock in high end warming there will be major consequences for populations, especially the poor & those in low lying areas.
#futuregenerations -
Pointing out facts is not selfish. And if you're going to play the I'm-doing-it-for-the-world's-poor card, why not actually listen to what the world's poor is telling us are their top priorities? (Hint: not global warming) http://data.myworld2015.org/ pic.twitter.com/aaMUSXXIvp
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Tol is the only one deluded enough to believe his slightly positive 1.0 K value which comes from his blowing the agricultural response. Also Gremlins https://www.desmogblog.com/2015/08/03/richard-tol-s-gremlins-continue-undermine-his-work …pic.twitter.com/Uz9qChLAUL
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.