Hey, look, it's Lomborg dishonestly equivocating on energy vs. electricity for the millionth time! Great Job, Bjorn. What a meaningful life you're leading.https://twitter.com/BjornLomborg/status/929715302509801472 …
Please. Correctly quoting IEA numbers is the opposite of dishonest But understand inconvenient information might be disquieting
-
-
"Correctly quoting"
-
At least pull out "rejected energy" from the calculation :)
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
The question is why do you keep making this same point over and over again. Once upon a time electric lighting was only present in less than 1% of all homes. Candles and gas were everywhere. But it didn’t mean electricity was doomed to be peripheral for all time.
-
Because most people believe that solar and wind is huge (and are led to believe so). Reality is that renewable's small percentage could stay small for very long – or forever http://vaclavsmil.com/wp-content/uploads/scientificamerican0114-521.pdf …pic.twitter.com/bAFC6Lub2D
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.