And remember, helping future victims is NOT about cutting CO₂ (inefficient) but smart adaptation http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/365/1860/2717 …pic.twitter.com/igXN6QXcVn
Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
And remember, helping future victims is NOT about cutting CO₂ (inefficient) but smart adaptation http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/365/1860/2717 …pic.twitter.com/igXN6QXcVn
But problem is that the intensity is trending upward. So less hurricanes but more devastating due to warmer ocean.
No, category IS intensity ... not even category 4&5 are trending upwards with Irma
1931-60 (30 yrs increased activity): 26 major - previous 50 years (1881-'30): 29, following 50 years ('61-2010): 27 …http://www.hurricanetracker.colonieweatheronline.com/landfalls.html
Yes very comforting to those who have lost everything and their lives changed forever. At least it won't happen that often
How about this : https://www.google.ca/search?q=great+pacific+garbage+patch&tbm=isch&client=safari&ved=0ahUKEwjJ9tz46pPWAhXJyFQKHdGpChgQtI8BCCUoAA … should we just keep on keeping on? Let's get our heads out of our asses and take pollution serious!
Business as usual B. a. u. + Cable News B. a. u. + C. N. + Internet B. a. u. + C. N. + I. + Smartphones
If the effects are due to a recent tipping point, maybe in past 5 years, this would NOT how up in a 100-yr trend line. Bad logic, wrong data
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.