Not true. Author of cited paper says "Gahhh!" Organics require 25-110% more land, but skews to 25%. Average is not 70%; median is 55%.https://twitter.com/BjornLomborg/status/893375911818612736 …
Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Dear Tamar. I've now twice documented the 70% average (https://twitter.com/BjornLomborg/status/893376260017188864 …). Your pic documents no average. "Gahhh" is not enough
Could you cite a link with those data? I don't see them in the paper, & the author is frustrated that you are not citing his paper correctly
thanks, of course. It is simply a pivot table of Figure 1, as downloaded from their paper, http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/12/6/064016/media/ERL_12_6_064016_figuredata.xlsx …, taking the average
And my median is from the correspondence with the author.
Yes, and using same figure 1 data I also get 55% for the median. That makes it sound like the average also should be 70% (or 69%)
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.