1. Gaining onshore planning consent is now virtually impossible. 2. Everything else is subsidy free is it? Hmm
How can anyone still claim green energy is competitive? Subsidy cut (not elimination) means 95% fall in investment.https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/jan/04/renewables-investment-uk-fall-95-percent-three-years-study-subsidy-cuts-emissions-targets …
-
-
-
Fossil fuels are. And Petroleum Revenue Tax imposed.
@bjornlomborgpic.twitter.com/9FJ3fQjTKc
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
No electricity generation tech would work without support in developed world today. We created mess.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Now that’s another potential benefit for UK fracking that’s rarely espoused.
@bjornlomborg@guardianKiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Time 4 grown ups to deal with energy policy. Weather dependant energy cannot run a country.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
I hope you realize lots of places produce oil & gas with little or no military protection
@BjornLomborg@guardianKiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
You do realize that oil & gas can be transported via pipelines. Lots of these borders aren't even real
@BjornLomborg@guardian -
Future of hydrocarbon energy is increasingly led by bar gas. Most of it outside the ME
@BjornLomborg@guardian
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Mate you don't have to sarcastic yeah. Point is you wrongly attributed military protection as a reason for high cost of oil 1/2
-
Every country will accord protection to their industries. That's the whole reason companies pay taxes, no. Have a good day 2/2
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.