Reality check: if solar contributes 30%, it is only worth ⅓ the price. #stillnotcompetitive
http://www.nature.com/articles/nenergy201636 …pic.twitter.com/W93Fx3JXjw
-
@BjornLomborg These studies assume that grid utilisation is 100%, when it's actually closer to 30%, even lower. It's garbage.
@evcricket that's just wrong. Read papers cited. Cost declines, bc solar only produces at certain times with ever-more supply chasing demand
-
-
@BjornLomborg I've read them and others and think the fundamental assumptions are critically flawed. -
@evcricket But has nothing to do w/assuming 100% util. It is supply chasing demand, as here http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=7005038 …pic.twitter.com/D7z0e1FjIR
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.