And Lomborg ignores the global poor live in the areas where renewables are often cheaper than fossil fuels already: http://bit.ly/19qoAva
-
@BjornLomborg Or not. Perhaps fossil fuels will be required. But not what's at hand where energy poverty is now.@sharifmatar
@ramez @sharifmatar well, there is already a big need for fridges, clean (not just cleaner) stoves+industry.
-
-
@ramez@sharifmatar US opposition to South African coal (Medupi) that creates jobs seems unreasonable (see story in http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/04/opinion/the-poor-need-cheap-fossil-fuels.html?_r=1& …) -
@BjornLomborg@sharifmatar I do agree the burden should be more on rich countries than poor to reduce carbon emissions.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.