Bjorn LomborgVarmennettu tili

.@BjornLomborg the sad fact is that the politicians of the West have answered your question with a resounding 'Yes'. To their eternal shame.

@BjornLomborg The short answer is NO. But the consequences will come sooner or later.

@BjornLomborg We have to face REALITY. Our emissions will continue to increase for years (decades) to come.

@BjornLomborg Let's not dream about 2040. Let's ask the pertinent question: will 2014 emissions be lower than those of 2013?

@BjornLomborg Who are "we" to deny anything? What should be done is provide patent-free access to green tech, so it's cheaper to install.

@BjornLomborg Ideally we would remove the toxic contaminants and have clean energy for the poor. Saving lives worth the costs.

@BjornLomborg @ClimateDepot It's not THAT polluting with today's tech. Crude, tar etc. is dirty and by burning it we're getting rid of it.

@BjornLomborg @ClimateDepot Burning dirty fuels is actually an act of cleaning the planet's surface.

“@BjornLomborg: MT deny 3bn energy-poor ppl use of fossil fuel? No need: sub solar 4 kerosene 4 lighting, sub biofuel 4 charcoal 4 cooking

@BjornLomborg Your article in the NY Times reminded me of something Thomas Sowell once said: “There are no solutions; only trade-offs."