UN/IPCC: the planet's temperature is running lower than pretty much *all* simulations. https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10152042274618968&set=a.221758208967.168468.146605843967&type=1 …,pic.twitter.com/YyhqQcYrzM
-
.
@BjornLomborg Here is why this graph and Lomborg's statement are misleading. http://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2013/oct/01/ipcc-global-warming-projections-accurate ….
@PeterGleick my graph IPCC, do your own with CMIP5; wishing doesn't make overshoot go away https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151946065398968&set=pb.146605843967.-2207520000.1383042637.&type=3&src=https%3A%2F%2Fscontent-a-ams.xx.fbcdn.net%2Fhphotos-prn2%2F8667_10151946065398968_1222530957_n.png&size=822%2C712 … https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10152042274618968&set=a.221758208967.168468.146605843967&type=1 …
-
-
@BjornLomborg@PeterGleick It's easy to screw up the visual comparison with improper baselining. The trends don't lie http://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2013/oct/01/ipcc-global-warming-projections-accurate … -
@dana1981@BjornLomborg@PeterGleick Dana denies satellite technology...
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
.
@BjornLomborg Your graph is embarrassingly wrong. Why do you keep promoting it?@PeterGleickKiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.