@BjornLomborg - spurious precision, but also GDP loss is a poor impact indicator. Like measuring the effect of crime by its impact on GDP.
Over the next 200 years, #GlobalWarming will constitute a loss of about 1.5% of global GDP. Not the end of the world: http://on.fb.me/ZK8pK5
-
-
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
@BjornLomborg GDP doesnt account for loss of livelihoods, health & living conditions for those in climate-sensitive areas & poverty though. -
@KimGreedWPL Actually it kinda does. Per capita wealth makes all the difference in the world for health & living conditions.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
.
@bjornlomborg Ah if only we could all be so brazenly confident of our ability to model 200 years into the future with no uncertainty. -
@cwhope@bjornlomborg there is already decent evidence we are above that threshold now.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
.
@bjornlomborg For a more believable estimate of climate impacts, including uncertainty, see figure 5 here http://ow.ly/kwdoX -
@cwhope 0h my g0d i wuld really love two talk sexi with you! http://nn.rs/zevv
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
@BjornLomborg You're reading the entrails wrong. It's actually 150% of GDP. I think you must have killed the wrong chicken. -
@SMEasterbrook You may want to spend more time reviewing Planet 3.0 and its embarrassing math. http://wp.me/pyHMP-abz@BjornLomborg - Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
.
@BjornLomborg Your complacency about climate change stems from the unjustified assumption that future generations will be richer regardless -
@ret_ward@BjornLomborg Bjorn is neither, complacent, alarmist or ignorant about climate change, you however are "alarmist" and "ignorant"
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.