Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Oops Do you remember how the UN kept saying Madagascar experienced the "world’s first climate-induced famine”? Well, the UN lied Poverty, not climate, caused Madagascar’s food crisis, an actual study findshttps://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/dec/01/poverty-not-climate-breakdown-caused-madagascars-food-crisis-finds-study …
Here is another, more straight-forward headline: UN wrong https://www.rt.com/news/541970-un-wrong-climate-induced-famine/ … and here is the study: https://www.worldweatherattribution.org/factors-other-than-climate-change-are-the-main-drivers-of-recent-food-insecurity-in-southern-madagascar/ …
Is it possible, just possible, that media could stop just gullibly reporting everything as climate catastrophe and instead report facts? Measured in hardest-to-fudge metric, deaths from climate-related disasters have declined 99% over past centuryhttps://twitter.com/bjornlomborg/status/1419352336128950280 …
I am shocked that the guardian can report something factual. They normally call articles like climate change denier. I hope this points towards a trend of reexamining and looking at reports more critically and always jumping on "blame climate change "
If you are wrong, and you convinced all those hundred thousands followers to not care about climate change, you do understand you are responsible for a lot of suffering right? Climate science tells us we have a carbon budget, there isn't time left for speculations.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
