Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Rich 1st-worlders denying poor nations fossil energy to feel good about climate
"the global climate-industrial complex: campaigners aided by their handmaidens in academia and stenographers in media"
As always, @TedNordhaus worth reading:
https://www.economist.com/by-invitation/2021/11/19/ted-nordhaus-on-how-green-activists-mislead-and-hold-back-progress …pic.twitter.com/81qs9wax6e
Like these well-meaning women from a rich nation with good education, warm homes, great health care and lots of energy telling Mozambique to stay poor and off fossil fuels https://twitter.com/ShellenbergerMD/status/1460472241951551489 …pic.twitter.com/A3TVY5x4Aq
Everyone listen to Bjorn, who thinks 3.75C of warming is ‘optimal’ 
pic.twitter.com/70s7ZzQ6it
Dishonest Taken out of context (why there is no link: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2008/oct/14/climatechange-scienceofclimatechange …) Argues we should check our models against data and experience Ignores I *right before* confirm sea level rise And that rise will pick up again (from my earlier Guardian) https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2008/jul/14/climatechange …pic.twitter.com/WdaSFGGHDN
A good text indeed. As to #ClimateCrisis technology transfer, #Denmark and others could lead by example and transfer eg wind turbine technology for free to developing countries @Vestas. This would make a tangible impact
Like Marie Antoinette saying, "let them eat cake"?
Nothing is cheaper than wind and solar. Since most fossil fuel generating plants are built, serviced and supplied by first world nations, you're just shilling for those rich capitalists at the expense of developing nations.
Very much agree. Rich countries consider prosperity as a given and climate change as the only important issue to address. The worrying part is their willing neglect. It’s an inconvenient truth to them that climate change mitigation measures have downsides:https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01020-z …
Lomborg, Nordhaus, Shellenberger, and Epstein. All well funded by big energy interests and very short on consistent and accurate science to support their flawed arguments. #ClimateBrawlhttps://archive.thinkprogress.org/memo-to-media-dont-be-suckered-by-bad-analyses-from-the-breakthrough-institute-the-way-time-wsj-npr-a0b77f6f846c/ …
When I read, "are well funded" I interpret "I haven't got a clue about the substantive issues and so a red herring is the best I can come up with.pic.twitter.com/Zy2YsP6h9h
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
