Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Complaining that incorrect 𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 makes it seem like "the summary finding of SR 1.5" is just laughable not the least because the graphic includes the Chapter title subsection title "3.5.2.4 RFC 4 – Global aggregate impacts" page number and linkpic.twitter.com/Mwb4THeX6K
But of course, it is easier to baselessly vilify others rather than addressing the central problem of alarmism incorrectly exaggerating and needlessly scaring people, as my original tweet pointed out https://twitter.com/BjornLomborg/status/1460342285384699905 …pic.twitter.com/kw7XDBwBvV
Bjorn, climate alarmists are a plague and they are heard more than you are. Unfortunately, you have a limited reach. You should have millions more followers. I retweet as much as I can, but it is limited. The MSM narrative goes on.
Stop misrepresenting the global burned area. The decline is mostly in grassy ecosystems and has non-climatic factors. https://royalsociety.org/blog/2020/10/global-trends-wildfire/ …pic.twitter.com/xZxCy6q1yi
Complaining about being “baselessly vilified” on Twitter is laughable. Grow some skin if you’re going to make claims that don’t hold up under scrutiny.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
