Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
The constant droning on how missing 1.5°C is the end of the world is just ridiculous Here from Reuters — no, the world is burning 𝗹𝗲𝘀𝘀 and will continue to do so PS Yes, climate is a problem, and climate policy can make it burn even less https://www.reuters.com/business/cop/un-climate-negotiators-go-into-overtime-save-15-celsius-goal-2021-11-13/ …pic.twitter.com/Vo1m2qEMf0
One way to see that 1.5°C is not end-of-world: UN Climate Panel finds that 1.5°C will cause damages equal to 0.3% of global GDP by 2100 2°C: 0.5% And do-nothing: 2.6% Problem, not end-of-world https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/ page 256pic.twitter.com/cApfxq682m
I believe it is an architecture protection move to keep major sea-level cities from water inflows, primarily. Otherwise, trillions of investment goes to waist. ie. Making billions of people count their carbon so lower Manhattan stays dry.
Sorry if I’m not reading this right, but I’m missing the projected sea level increase projections? Have I missed something? Thanks
It is an attempt to estimate the total costs from sea-level rise, temperature rise, extreme weather etc, all into one cost estimate of % of GDP
Never use a point estimate for a fat tailed distribution. The tail risks are not benign
Also, all these numbers are complete conjecture.
Why are you pasting numbers from one cited reference under the header to make ist seem as if that was the reports summary?
Can you explain this ??https://twitter.com/DoctorVive/status/1460374057707311107 …
It is idiotic to try to frame the problem in terms of economic loss or some other BS arbitrary metric like that. What you're doing is sophomoric demagoguery for the benefit of fossil fuel corps. If we do nothing the land of 3.5 billion turn to Sahara by 2070. THAT IS THE PROBLEM.
Well said, reminded me of this article:https://undark.org/2021/11/11/its-time-we-stop-listening-to-economists-on-climate-change/ …
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
