Interesting debate. The data you presented is clear. To me it is unfortunate, that most statements from the other panelist are not founded in concrete data. Like others, they draw decisions that seem to be driven by a consensus reached based on a non evidence base platform.
Here is our conversation on how to fix climate change; good to talk to @NaomiAKlein and @aguribfakim
Here you can see the whole debate
Thanks, @DohaDebateshttps://twitter.com/i/broadcasts/1MnxnkqgewLKO …
-
-
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
I enjoyed watch you man..... All your solutions seriously need implementation.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Knocked it out of the park. It’s a shame that people don’t have the same forward thinking ideas and want to raise taxes and give innefectual governments even more control
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Flawed forum gave Naomi a platform to perpetuate her claims, whilst not giving Bjorn enough time to demonstrate why she is deluded using the data. Anyone can throw out misinformation in a 30 sec statement, but it may take 10 mins to present the data to show they are wrong.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Certainly interesting. It also would be interesting to discuss the COVID-19 vaccine example further. It is a great story about the fruits of innovation and how quickly by historical standards benefits are flowing globally, not just to the 10%.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.