Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Study emphasizes cost-benefit is a simplification: Leaves out injury (electric cars worse) air pollution (electric cars better, though http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/es202347q …) air pollution (heavier electric cars means more air pollution from tires)
To the many arguing that heavier (electric) cars are safer: yes, for their occupants, but even more unsafe for the cars they hit, leading to overall higher risk of mortality A heavier car has externality, making others die more Based on this: https://academic.oup.com/restud/article-abstract/81/2/535/1517632 …pic.twitter.com/LQ775kMTqg
Heavier is also harder on the roads, requiring more maintenance sooner, and that has to be paid for with new taxes.
One can hope all cars will be electric (Teslas) then.
The location of the weight is safer. As Tesla is 25% of EV market they have a far better ADAS system on average which is far more important than vehicle weight.
Not to mention when they catch on fire
Actually, some diesel cars are meanwhile heavier than electric cars and due to their bulky engine, Diesel cars don't offer long crumple zones like electric cars do.https://twitter.com/N_Schmid/status/1385675370192588804 …
Can you name a vehicle in the same class that is lighter than Tesla Model 3?
True in theory. That’s why autonomous or assisted driving can help improve safety. You think $TSLA doesn’t know it?
When every second car is a SUV anyway... not much different.
If we don't solve climate change we will have much more mortality.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
