That sort of articles would be unthinkable a couple of months ago. Something might be changing.
This WSJ series is actually based on resources like Nobel Laureate climate economists William Nordhaus and the UN Climate Panel (but not politically correct outcomes) Doesn't want to show full article — somebody might accidentally learn something well: https://www.wsj.com/articles/climate-change-world-doomed-gdp-warming-earth-11632338084 … https://twitter.com/JohnFehlauer/status/1442523447792439308 …pic.twitter.com/ULJG8UpaRJ
-
-
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Unlike climate science there is no consensus among economists of future economic impacts of climate change. Your framework is a binary choice between “humanity is doomed” vs small compared to indoor burning of wood and dung. 1/2
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Climate scientists and Dr. Nordhaus support a middle ground: AGW is a serious problem that will get worse until we stop adding GHGs to the atmosphere. How much worse is unclear, but somewhere between really bad and catastrophic. We need to act now to avoid this. 2/2
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
More economists,
@BjornLomborg ? This is pretty circular - economist says climate science should be downplayed because other economists say so Let us know when you grasp the climate sciencepic.twitter.com/t35r5eSCKq
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.