Bjorn LomborgVarmennettu tili

Instead of “laudable” I thought you wrote “laughable”

It is not „principally laudable“. It’s exactly what happens if you go down the road of censorship.

A platform should never try to be a publisher.

One of the result of my work is that is that on the long run human cannot control human, bu pattern and systems can. the other from Popper. There is away to think tat oppose reason, and that's is essentialism. We just have to get rid of it.

Yup - again we see that free speech is something essential for a thriving society

It’s not laudable in principle because “who guards the guardians” is an inevitable infinite regress that will, in reality, only stop at a political agenda.

Indeed. Censorship of scientific or rational discussion can never be right even when the intentions are good as science develops through debate and is never complete.