Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Love how "cherry-picking" has become the climate-crowd's favorite word for "this information I don't want anyone to see" Only utter doom is acceptable Well, here's what they don't want you to see: Climate-related disasters have declined dramatically https://twitter.com/BjornLomborg/status/1419352336128950280 … https://twitter.com/PerArnesjo/status/1419384541072986116 …pic.twitter.com/YqbPEj6jWS
Nothing cherry-picking about trying to count all climate-related disaster deaths Cherry-picking is the constant showing of video-clips of single catastrophes ignoring "CNN effect" — today there's cameras everywhere 100 years ago, many more people died, but not on camera
Of course, the graph shows a decline of climate disaster *deaths* (missing deaths, hat-tip @GVVulpen)
Much the most deadly flooding event in the UK was at Lynmouth, almost 70 years ago. It would certainly be cited as proof of climate change if it happened today. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynmouth_Flood … (This comment is about confirmation bias of course, not climate change itself)
You created a strawman by cherry-picking non-credible proof of climate change. The real proof is in the peer-reviewed data that show our planet is warming due to the greenhouse effect. Peer-reviewed models indicate that this will have devastating effects for our planet.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
