We're currently seeing 166,000 fewer temperature-related deaths each year thanks to rising temperatures. My latest interview: https://video.foxnews.com/v/6272986663001#sp=show-clips … And the corresponding op-ed with source links:https://archive.md/E03QZ
-
Näytä tämä ketju
-
Vastauksena käyttäjille @BjornLomborg ja @clim8resistance
Perhaps, for now. Wait until large parts of the Middle East become uninhabitable and coastal countries like Bangladesh flood. There are already problems from climate change and they show no signs of slowing down.
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @Losing_Streak42 ja @clim8resistance
This is certainly the understanding we're being told But e.g. flooding, we're not going to see more, but actually fewer people and less damage, despite rising sea levels — because of adaptation https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162520304157 …pic.twitter.com/dawNuUY4d8
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 4 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @BjornLomborg ja @clim8resistance
I admire your optimism. I won't be here in 2100 but I hope for those that are the adaptation is applied and is as successful as you predict.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä
Just fyi, this is not my optimism, but one of the best models of adaptation (Hinkel et al); their basic point is that most countries will spend billions to avoid trillions in losses (although some will have to see a catastrophe like Katrina, to invest to avoid the next one)
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.