Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
As a proportion of GDP?!? This only demonstrates that GDP has grown a little faster than flood damage costs. Hardly surprising is it?
GDP is used as proxy for societal wealth If twice number of houses (or twice as big/costly), the same flood will now destroy twice as much You have to correct for that to get impact from disasters This is also position of UN: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/?Text=&Goal=11&Target=11.5 …pic.twitter.com/6YSzr2EeSA
In that case you’ld also have to correct for investments in mitigation and defences, which would have strong positive returns initially but may have diminishing returns as the earth heats up
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
The World Is Getting Safer From Floods by 
