Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Medical journal editors become climate lobbyists They ask for $trillions of climate investments without considering that to improve public health, there are many other ways to help much more — like vaccinations https://archive.ph/p9Vrw https://www.wsj.com/articles/doctors-join-the-climate-lobby-medical-journal-editorial-bmj-11631048529 …
The medical journal editors made headlines across the world, but read their argument: Their most substantial argument is that over 20 years heat kills 50% more old — conveniently ignoring that four-fifth increase because more old peoplehttps://twitter.com/BjornLomborg/status/1434924023771803659 …
Surely, it's a basic epidemiological practice, which any peer reviewer should pick up on, to express mortality as a rate per 100,000? Failure to do so is a form of collusion and scientific fraud.
It’s not a mistake. It’s just a shortcut to funding for their perpetually irrelevant research.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
