Here you can see more data, https://twitter.com/BjornLomborg/status/1329040774844059648 … https://twitter.com/BjornLomborg/status/1346839909940797440 … https://www.facebook.com/bjornlomborg/posts/400732184745124 …
Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Thanks for the piece. @ed_hawkins doesn’t this contradicts your earlier argument?
I think it is worth taking a look.
What's causing the common knowledge error? More storms or potential storms forming but not landing? More reporting with 24 hour news? Increase population affected?
We now have knowledge of lots of hurricanes we never saw before (1933 was most energetic Atlantic hurricane season, but we found no hurricanes in half of Atlantic https://twitter.com/BjornLomborg/status/1346839905620676611 …) CNN-effect (anything happening now, you can see) +everyone blaming climate for everything
Thank you for your work. The fact that hard data such as this is rarely discussed, if not censored by the climate change industry, I mean scientific community is telling of how biased the research has become. I hope more people take notice and become more critical.
Why is the record in Newark of any value in assessing national or global meteorological trends?
Bjorn, why do you repeat the same misleading stats over… and over… and over… and over…
#ClimateBrawl #ClimateCrisis #climatechange #ClimateEmergency
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.