"[Economists] assumed that the economy without climate policy was performing optimally, so that any limit on GHG emissions would hurt economic growth" (by definition). Still the case today...
What more could the fossil industry want?
@BenFrantahttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09644016.2021.1947636 …
Note, this seems very tendentious: "neither economist provided a detailed analysis to support his conclusions." Except Nordhaus provided 66p of detailed analysis (and the rest of his career) to support that conclusion; Shelling 33p and his career https://nap.edu/catalog/18714/changing-climate-report-of-the-carbon-dioxide-assessment-committee …pic.twitter.com/KzqExiQS9w
-
-
Thanks, I’ll double check that
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
You and nordhaus have been debunked so many times I'm surprised you still appear in these threads.
-
So is that why he was awarded Nobel Prize in Economics?
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Thanks for clarifying this Bjorn.
@Peters_Glen are you going to acknowledge this?Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.