Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Not surprising that 20% lower than 2005 by 2050 is affordable — 2020 was 30.5% lower (although Covid) But "cost increases dramatically from moderate to ambitious" climate policy It is implausible to sell $1000s or more in annual costs to most voters https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-021-01128-0 …pic.twitter.com/UkMy8zlqkI
Instead of high-cost climate policies telling people 'no' We should dramatically ramp up investment in green R&D, from $15 to $100bn/yr (much cheaper) Such innovation can drive price of low-CO₂ energy down below fossil fuels and help everyone switchhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162520304157 …
There are people evacuating their homes right now because of a hurricane. R&D is a great investment for the future, but that shouldn't come at the expense of action today. (There are also many steps in between lab research and implementation that we could focus on scaling up)
Ja. Maar heeft Dhr. Lomborg niet gewoon gelijk?
Afgeschien van het feit dat de ‘verschrikkelijke opwarming’ wel wat meevalt?
Klimaat beleid maakt vooral meer stuk dan het repareert.
Klimaat alarmistisch geroeptoerer is de ware klimaatramp
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
