Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
You don't see this as an issue:https://twitter.com/RARohde/status/1429108539960745994 …
Yes, potential issue, although well-known4decades Question is: u believe assessment by some of the best climatologists (who of course know Rohde's points) for US NCA and EPA, using three different methods, or Dessler's slapdash performance? U still owe me answer on that
This is a really nice example of the fragility of expert assessment in the face of concerted efforts by those who appear to have expertise to undercut their authority This is very much like doctors who take to Twitter to tell their followers that vaccines are dangerous
Or when economists claim they've managed to calculate how heatwaves and the breakdown of natural systems affect GDP.
I believe both sources can be right. EPA et al. use the data available & Dessler et al.'s criticism of those data (& the index) is warranted. I also wonder if you're aware that the data only covers 48 states - Alaska fx isn't incl. I also wonder why you left out this EPA-graphpic.twitter.com/uXHSDZpEBM
Also see this and the replies: Extremely relevant to understand the issuehttps://twitter.com/ClimateOfGavin/status/1429118758522605570 …
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
Det var det vi skrev om sidste 
