Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
If you believe the first three statements, and you know that your selection of graphs have been and will be widely used to mislead people to mistakenly believe the opposite, then why do you produce and circulate them?
Because I also believe the fourth statement — scaring people witless doesn't lead to smart policies When EPA and UN Climate Assessment both say heatwaves max in 1930s, is it okay — for the cause — to claim otherwise?
As you know, there are thousands of technically true statements that are misleading. Making it your goal to widely circulate such statements when you know that many people will be misled about climate change getting worse seems pedantic at best, and disingenuous at worst.
I'm glad you included the last tweet in your thread, and careful readers of your work know that you do not deny the reality of worsening climate change. But we both know your work is also widely used by those who do deny climate change, and you facilitate that mistake.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
