One of the things you learn as a scientist is the ability to look at a plot and think, "that just doesn't look right." That's the feeling I got when I saw this plot that Lomborg is currently pushing.pic.twitter.com/L6Lz8jEuFw
Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Don't pretend this is some kind of legitimate argument. You know what you're doing here and I hope everyone else sees it too.
Debating models is good but any model in a dynamic system may lead observers to error, because of non linearities and irreversibility. See I. Prigogine's from Being to Becoming, 1980pic.twitter.com/gtpo40chgj
If you want to push a narrative that research shows such and such, the responsibility falls to you to do the scientific background work, INCLUDING looking at potential errors and biases in the data sets your using.
Spacing Out your reply *You* think it Presents your point with more clarity And emphasis BUT It actually makes you look like a crazy person
Well. Nice to know that Author and Think Tank President Lomborg cares more about getting attention than, you know, trying to give our grandchildren a livable environment. Good luck!
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.