Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
A quick overview of what the new UN Climate Panel report *actually* says about extreme weather by @RogerPielkeJr
Contrary to what you've been reading, the report offers grounds for optimism on climate science and policy
https://rogerpielkejr.substack.com/p/how-to-understand-the-new-ipcc-report-1e3 …pic.twitter.com/DCuwdvAYB6
Based on this graph the IPCC thinks that if it wasn’t for human induced warming we would still be living in the Little Ice Age. I’m not the first to point out the simulated natural factors can’t account for historically higher temperatures over the past 7000 years.pic.twitter.com/3lsmRZ5rnM
So no need to do anything then….https://twitter.com/Petagna/status/1425871595785138191 …
pic.twitter.com/3EtJa85WBbMaybe you should actually read the article before jumping to conclusions
'Dramatically rising temperatures aren't that bad if you look at these metrics' is a terrible way of approaching data that is and should be alarming. It concerns me groups denying climate change or wanting to delay action are securing significant funding.https://time.com/6088531/ipcc-climate-report-hockey-stick-curve …
The report said "does not always lead to greater flooding" and you are concluding flooding = No? That's one hell of a jump!pic.twitter.com/5wuV2rD5Dq
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
