Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
He does not lie with statistics. He is inventing his own numbers in a parallel reality. 53Mton was avoided in 2019 and in 2030 it will be between 120 and 410 Mton (current total of Turkye or Australia). In 2050 it could be 4 times more (current total of Russia).
With current promises (Stated policies scenario), from p89, net avoided GHG goes from 53mt to 106mt, or 53mt additional reduction Not invented, but documented https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/ed5f4484-f556-4110-8c5c-4ede8bcba637/GlobalEVOutlook2021.pdf …pic.twitter.com/Cf82DeApHC
I challenge you to explain the speed of uptake and the emissions per km with details. I think you are just parotting something that fits your narrative. It's not like the IEAs stated (then called new) policy scenario ever underestimated new tech before ;-) https://twitter.com/AukeHoekstra/status/1333192375259295744 …pic.twitter.com/eQqLOVy7LR
And by the way: that line of emissions saves is not horizontal. Are you really so dumb that you don't know you should fit a curve to it and make your prediction based on that or are you in bad faith?
If you scroll 1 page further: 120 Mton avoidance with EV in 2030 (not 106) for stated policies scenario, which is outdated because the EU pledged 55% reduction instead of 40% in 2030. So the sustainable scenario of 410 Mton avoidance by EV is in sight. In 2050 more to come.pic.twitter.com/pGBkTYX3sn
Good that you actually read the report! But even that 14 higher number will still be going up fast. See title on page before: "reduction of GHG emissions from EVs increases over time." So it's twice bollox. But I bet he's not man enough to admit that.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
