Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
"If everyone lived like the US, we'd need 5 earths" — almost completely fallacious We live well within 67% of the world (ecological footprint) But the scare comes from claiming we need 106% forest to soak up CO₂. Why not just use solar (<<1% area)? https://www.facebook.com/bjornlomborg/posts/377093583775651 …pic.twitter.com/Joz2PkO298
Today is Earth Overshoot Day (when we've allegedly used 100% of earth) but it is mostly based on poor methodology Read my Forbes:https://www.forbes.com/sites/bjornlomborg/2017/08/02/one-planet-is-enough …
Also remember that regenerative agriculture is a much larger co2-sink than treeplantations. Regenerate by using animals as main tool, more fire breaks in the forests and all over the vast desertifiing areas of the world. @SavoryInstitute
Bjorn, you are good, very good :-) "We should plant 2000m2 of forests to soak a ton of CO₂ emitted up. But if we planted wind turbines or solar panels instead, we would need only about 30m2 or less". This is rational ecology. Not the political nonsenses we hear every single day.
Thanks for this enlightening article! Do they still calculate Earth Overshoot Day in the same way (the article is some 4 years old) using tree planting as the means to compensate for CO2 emissions?
yes, this is their latest academic update and the major development is a better estimate of Average Forest-Carbon Sequestration (AFCS) https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/7/3/58 …pic.twitter.com/Ckyne7q2yT
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
